<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Updates the Upcoming Apps Dashboards to Address Privacy Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/04/facebook-updates-the-upcoming-apps-dashboards-to-address-privacy-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/04/facebook-updates-the-upcoming-apps-dashboards-to-address-privacy-concerns/</link>
	<description>Tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform for Developers and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Bunyan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/04/facebook-updates-the-upcoming-apps-dashboards-to-address-privacy-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-61939</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Bunyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=23886#comment-61939</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d mostly agree, Mike, although I think it could be critical for a small number of fairly large dating apps. These tend to buy their traffic as there&#039;s virtually no viral growth and usage would probably drop significantly if they their use was virtually public knowledge.

Of course, Facebook (being Facebook) mentions health-related apps in the announcement and that&#039;s another category, although the volume is much bound to be much smaller.

And lastly that I can think of: beta versions of apps where you may want a dozen or so testers to access an app but not to have their friends discovering them. The current &quot;friend everyone to see an app in developer mode&quot; system doesn&#039;t work too well.

I&#039;m sure there are others, and I certainly agree that it&#039;s going to be a tiny proportion, but I think that the visibility issue was quite a big deal for those apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d mostly agree, Mike, although I think it could be critical for a small number of fairly large dating apps. These tend to buy their traffic as there&#8217;s virtually no viral growth and usage would probably drop significantly if they their use was virtually public knowledge.</p>
<p>Of course, Facebook (being Facebook) mentions health-related apps in the announcement and that&#8217;s another category, although the volume is much bound to be much smaller.</p>
<p>And lastly that I can think of: beta versions of apps where you may want a dozen or so testers to access an app but not to have their friends discovering them. The current &#8220;friend everyone to see an app in developer mode&#8221; system doesn&#8217;t work too well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are others, and I certainly agree that it&#8217;s going to be a tiny proportion, but I think that the visibility issue was quite a big deal for those apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Knoop</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/04/facebook-updates-the-upcoming-apps-dashboards-to-address-privacy-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-61838</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Knoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=23886#comment-61838</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine many apps would actually use this -- I mean, why would an application purposely opt-out of a point of distribution?


The only case I could see this happening is if the application is taboo, but often those aren&#039;t allowed on the Platform anyway. If there is even a chance that an app might pick up users through this new dashboard, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s worth disabling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine many apps would actually use this &#8212; I mean, why would an application purposely opt-out of a point of distribution?</p>
<p>The only case I could see this happening is if the application is taboo, but often those aren&#8217;t allowed on the Platform anyway. If there is even a chance that an app might pick up users through this new dashboard, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s worth disabling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/04/facebook-updates-the-upcoming-apps-dashboards-to-address-privacy-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-61837</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=23886#comment-61837</guid>
		<description>&quot;it will go live shortly after the dashboards launch to users.”  After??  Launch the privacy breach first, and then fix it after the damage is done?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;it will go live shortly after the dashboards launch to users.”  After??  Launch the privacy breach first, and then fix it after the damage is done?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

