<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Facebook Creating a New Type of News Feed Story for Apps to Reengage Users?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/11/12/is-facebook-creating-a-new-type-of-news-feed-story-for-apps-to-reengage-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/11/12/is-facebook-creating-a-new-type-of-news-feed-story-for-apps-to-reengage-users/</link>
	<description>Tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform for Developers and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Sherov</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/11/12/is-facebook-creating-a-new-type-of-news-feed-story-for-apps-to-reengage-users/comment-page-1/#comment-43969</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Sherov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=19835#comment-43969</guid>
		<description>Facebook mentioned this during their initial talk about the roadmap. This isn&#039;t really new news. 

This is not a &quot;news feed&quot;, it is part of the new &quot;games dashboard&quot; they will be implementing.
They also mentioned this new viral channel would be specifically for games, although that may have changed amidst all the current backlash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook mentioned this during their initial talk about the roadmap. This isn&#8217;t really new news. </p>
<p>This is not a &#8220;news feed&#8221;, it is part of the new &#8220;games dashboard&#8221; they will be implementing.<br />
They also mentioned this new viral channel would be specifically for games, although that may have changed amidst all the current backlash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Post</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/11/12/is-facebook-creating-a-new-type-of-news-feed-story-for-apps-to-reengage-users/comment-page-1/#comment-43965</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=19835#comment-43965</guid>
		<description>Some great insights here and perhaps much more important to facebook&#039;s future than it might at first appear.

In particular, with the reintroduction of the “publishStoryToUser” method (or whatever it ends up being called), I believe we are seeing the very beginning of Facebook becoming the VRM hub of all our vendor (think: brands) relationships.

By limiting the communication to a one-to-one basis, Facebook is creating a channel through which vendors can finally realize the potential of double-opt in permission based marketing.

If I have a Fan Page for jetBlue, which offers me the opportunity to enter my account (frequent flyer) information, there&#039;s an opportunity for jetBlue to send me completely customized offers should I so choose. Every Fan page will have a number of custom communications setting to regulate how much and what type of information you receive from the vendor.

Such a direct channel will become extremely valuable and Facebook will be able to charge for it. Look for Facebook&#039;s VRM channels to surpass Google&#039;s revenues from search within a few short years.

The missing piece in the puzzle is that facebook needs to give users a much more robust and nuanced tool by which they can manage the dozens, if not hundreds, of VRM relationships.

Additionally, people&#039;s relationships with brands, institutions, organizations, non-profits, etc. are an important component to their public personas. Therefore, Facebook will eventually need to build a tab called Affiliations, which lets people display those vendor relationships they choose to display.

Thanks for a thought provoking blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great insights here and perhaps much more important to facebook&#8217;s future than it might at first appear.</p>
<p>In particular, with the reintroduction of the “publishStoryToUser” method (or whatever it ends up being called), I believe we are seeing the very beginning of Facebook becoming the VRM hub of all our vendor (think: brands) relationships.</p>
<p>By limiting the communication to a one-to-one basis, Facebook is creating a channel through which vendors can finally realize the potential of double-opt in permission based marketing.</p>
<p>If I have a Fan Page for jetBlue, which offers me the opportunity to enter my account (frequent flyer) information, there&#8217;s an opportunity for jetBlue to send me completely customized offers should I so choose. Every Fan page will have a number of custom communications setting to regulate how much and what type of information you receive from the vendor.</p>
<p>Such a direct channel will become extremely valuable and Facebook will be able to charge for it. Look for Facebook&#8217;s VRM channels to surpass Google&#8217;s revenues from search within a few short years.</p>
<p>The missing piece in the puzzle is that facebook needs to give users a much more robust and nuanced tool by which they can manage the dozens, if not hundreds, of VRM relationships.</p>
<p>Additionally, people&#8217;s relationships with brands, institutions, organizations, non-profits, etc. are an important component to their public personas. Therefore, Facebook will eventually need to build a tab called Affiliations, which lets people display those vendor relationships they choose to display.</p>
<p>Thanks for a thought provoking blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

