<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook&#8217;s Proposed TOS Changes Explicitly Outlaw Selling Status Updates to Advertisers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/</link>
	<description>Tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform for Developers and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-32556</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-32556</guid>
		<description>Actually I had tried this.  I was paying the kids € 0.01 per each friend they had per each message.  How they loved it!  But I had stopped it already, it wasn&#039;t bringing results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I had tried this.  I was paying the kids € 0.01 per each friend they had per each message.  How they loved it!  But I had stopped it already, it wasn&#8217;t bringing results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Tightens Grip on Status Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-31234</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Tightens Grip on Status Updates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-31234</guid>
		<description>[...] has received some criticism in the past (ahem).  One of the more interesting changes? Users are now prohibited from using their Facebook profile for direct profit. That means selling your status updates to someone willing to pay for the exposure is now a big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has received some criticism in the past (ahem).  One of the more interesting changes? Users are now prohibited from using their Facebook profile for direct profit. That means selling your status updates to someone willing to pay for the exposure is now a big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Tightens Grip on Status Updates &#124; Unit1</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30632</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Tightens Grip on Status Updates &#124; Unit1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30632</guid>
		<description>[...] of the more interesting changes? Users are now prohibited from using their Facebook profile for direct profit. That means selling your status updates to someone willing to pay for the exposure is now a big [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the more interesting changes? Users are now prohibited from using their Facebook profile for direct profit. That means selling your status updates to someone willing to pay for the exposure is now a big [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ahlgren</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30606</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ahlgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30606</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t like this idea, the way it ends with innocent people to delete their profiles, so do not impose that rule thanks 

And instead of making stupid rules. So what about use the time to fix your page Iexplore doing. Exe errors at me if some writes via chat, 
Firefox goes crazy when people write on the chat, if I sites in another tab and writes something on a forrum and someone write via chat on FB. Then the other site blockers and can not write again until I have pressed F5. Even Chrome hav trouble whit the FB chat.
Possible fix the errors instead of wasting time on silly rules

And this happends on my computer + my laptop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t like this idea, the way it ends with innocent people to delete their profiles, so do not impose that rule thanks </p>
<p>And instead of making stupid rules. So what about use the time to fix your page Iexplore doing. Exe errors at me if some writes via chat,<br />
Firefox goes crazy when people write on the chat, if I sites in another tab and writes something on a forrum and someone write via chat on FB. Then the other site blockers and can not write again until I have pressed F5. Even Chrome hav trouble whit the FB chat.<br />
Possible fix the errors instead of wasting time on silly rules</p>
<p>And this happends on my computer + my laptop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De-Mock-cracy In Action: Facebook&#8217;s Open Governance - Programming Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30556</link>
		<dc:creator>De-Mock-cracy In Action: Facebook&#8217;s Open Governance - Programming Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30556</guid>
		<description>[...] marketing abuse. Facebook hopes to stop spammers from overrunning the site and as pointed out by Inside Facebook, prohibit companies like Magpie, Twittad and Sponsored Tweets from starting profile sponsoring [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] marketing abuse. Facebook hopes to stop spammers from overrunning the site and as pointed out by Inside Facebook, prohibit companies like Magpie, Twittad and Sponsored Tweets from starting profile sponsoring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Imbres &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fresh From Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30541</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Imbres &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fresh From Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30541</guid>
		<description>[...] to @Facebook for updating their TOS to ban users from selling their status updates to advertisers - http://bit.ly/Rq8JJBad puppy day&#8230;she learned to spaz out during conference calls and the joy of digging in INDOOR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to @Facebook for updating their TOS to ban users from selling their status updates to advertisers &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/Rq8JJBad" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Rq8JJBad</a> puppy day&#8230;she learned to spaz out during conference calls and the joy of digging in INDOOR [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Eliason</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30520</link>
		<dc:creator>James Eliason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30520</guid>
		<description>Hello, while I think I see your point here..Twittad doesn&#039;t currently have a Facebook platform.  Nor have we ever wanted to move into that space without the help or organization from Facebook.  

I do question how they will police this issue, I think Facebook might have missed out on a revenue share deal with some of their users.  Perhaps they will come back to this in the future. 

Regards, 
James Eliason 
Founder/CEO Twittad.com 
Founder http://spon.in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, while I think I see your point here..Twittad doesn&#8217;t currently have a Facebook platform.  Nor have we ever wanted to move into that space without the help or organization from Facebook.  </p>
<p>I do question how they will police this issue, I think Facebook might have missed out on a revenue share deal with some of their users.  Perhaps they will come back to this in the future. </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
James Eliason<br />
Founder/CEO Twittad.com<br />
Founder <a href="http://spon.in" rel="nofollow">http://spon.in</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De-Mock-cracy In Action: Facebook&#8217;s Open Governance &#124; Tech Story Site</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30427</link>
		<dc:creator>De-Mock-cracy In Action: Facebook&#8217;s Open Governance &#124; Tech Story Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30427</guid>
		<description>[...] marketing abuse. Facebook hopes to stop spammers from overrunning the site and as pointed out by Inside Facebook, prohibit companies like Magpie, Twittad and Sponsored Tweets from starting profile sponsoring [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] marketing abuse. Facebook hopes to stop spammers from overrunning the site and as pointed out by Inside Facebook, prohibit companies like Magpie, Twittad and Sponsored Tweets from starting profile sponsoring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finance Geek » Microsoft Will Put Office On Nokia Phones</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30383</link>
		<dc:creator>Finance Geek » Microsoft Will Put Office On Nokia Phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30383</guid>
		<description>[...] You can&#8217;t sell your Facebook status update to an advertiser [Inside Facebook] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can&#8217;t sell your Facebook status update to an advertiser [Inside Facebook] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikkel deMib Svendsen</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/08/11/facebooks-proposed-tos-changes-explicitly-outlaw-selling-status-updates-to-advertisers/comment-page-1/#comment-30377</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikkel deMib Svendsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=15437#comment-30377</guid>
		<description>Even though I don&#039;t like too strict rules I actually find this new restriction very wise. Paid comments polute social medias!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though I don&#8217;t like too strict rules I actually find this new restriction very wise. Paid comments polute social medias!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

