<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Issues Statement About Advertising Policies and User Photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/</link>
	<description>Tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform for Developers and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collaborative Social Sites for Couples, Families and Friends</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-34046</link>
		<dc:creator>Collaborative Social Sites for Couples, Families and Friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-34046</guid>
		<description>[...] Facebook Issues Statement About Advertising Policies and User Photos (insidefacebook.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook Issues Statement About Advertising Policies and User Photos (insidefacebook.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Adds New Privacy Setting for User Photos in Platform Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-28538</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Adds New Privacy Setting for User Photos in Platform Ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-28538</guid>
		<description>[...] week, following rumors that Facebook was letting third party ad networks incorporate any user photos in ads without their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, following rumors that Facebook was letting third party ad networks incorporate any user photos in ads without their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Tightens the Rules on Facebook Platform Ad Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-27218</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Tightens the Rules on Facebook Platform Ad Networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-27218</guid>
		<description>[...] incorporate users&#8217; photos in their ads without users&#8217; permission. Last Friday, Facebook issued a statement to debunk those rumors and reassure users that that was not the case, saying that while Platform ad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] incorporate users&#8217; photos in their ads without users&#8217; permission. Last Friday, Facebook issued a statement to debunk those rumors and reassure users that that was not the case, saying that while Platform ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyn Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-27031</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyn Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-27031</guid>
		<description>The thing that bothers me is that we have to find out through OTHER sources except Facebook. It&#039;s shady to say the least but it makes sense. If they announce it on the site nobody everyone is going to opt out, but it makes you wonder just what they can and will do in the future if this is how they operate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that bothers me is that we have to find out through OTHER sources except Facebook. It&#8217;s shady to say the least but it makes sense. If they announce it on the site nobody everyone is going to opt out, but it makes you wonder just what they can and will do in the future if this is how they operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-26940</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-26940</guid>
		<description>Interesting I have a blank page (have proof) if i go to http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=feeds&amp;tab=ads therefore I do not even get the choice

Dishonest huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting I have a blank page (have proof) if i go to <a href="http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=feeds&#038;tab=ads" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/privacy/?view=feeds&#038;tab=ads</a> therefore I do not even get the choice</p>
<p>Dishonest huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alethea Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-26935</link>
		<dc:creator>Alethea Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 23:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-26935</guid>
		<description>My daughter was at a friend&#039;s house, while using her friend&#039;s facebook account she saw my picture with some &#039;unkind words&#039; under it for a quiz. 

This really upset my daughter and she called me right away as she felt it was hurtful to me. (bless her heart)

I have since then been an advocate of TURNING OFF the feature as noted above.

Alethea Anderson
Social Networker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter was at a friend&#8217;s house, while using her friend&#8217;s facebook account she saw my picture with some &#8216;unkind words&#8217; under it for a quiz. </p>
<p>This really upset my daughter and she called me right away as she felt it was hurtful to me. (bless her heart)</p>
<p>I have since then been an advocate of TURNING OFF the feature as noted above.</p>
<p>Alethea Anderson<br />
Social Networker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook blasts away rumors regarding relaxation in advertising policies and user photos &#124; Geekword</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-26887</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook blasts away rumors regarding relaxation in advertising policies and user photos &#124; Geekword</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 14:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-26887</guid>
		<description>[...] There were rumors that were heard in the last few days that Facebook has relaxed its advertising policies that would allow and give advertisers the freedom to use and incorporate Facebook users&#8217; photos. In the last month, it was revealed that a couple of Facebook platfrom advertising networks were suspended owing to the fact that the ad networks were providing data of the Facebook users in a manner that were violating Facebook&#8217;s privacy policy. As you can imagine, it was necessary to Facebook to clarify these rumors, and that is exactly what facebook has done. Facebook came out and said: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There were rumors that were heard in the last few days that Facebook has relaxed its advertising policies that would allow and give advertisers the freedom to use and incorporate Facebook users&#8217; photos. In the last month, it was revealed that a couple of Facebook platfrom advertising networks were suspended owing to the fact that the ad networks were providing data of the Facebook users in a manner that were violating Facebook&#8217;s privacy policy. As you can imagine, it was necessary to Facebook to clarify these rumors, and that is exactly what facebook has done. Facebook came out and said: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0.2 &#187; Facebook si difende: mai autorizzato l&#8217;utilizzo di foto degli Utenti per scopi pubblicitari</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-26873</link>
		<dc:creator>0.2 &#187; Facebook si difende: mai autorizzato l&#8217;utilizzo di foto degli Utenti per scopi pubblicitari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-26873</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; InsideFacebook   Condividi questo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | InsideFacebook   Condividi questo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: non users</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-26856</link>
		<dc:creator>non users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-26856</guid>
		<description>Prob with app ads is that they display pics of friends who have never used that app. Like my friend posted screenshot of IQ ad which labels his friends never used as dumb/genius. Those friends had not taken that IQ quiz at all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prob with app ads is that they display pics of friends who have never used that app. Like my friend posted screenshot of IQ ad which labels his friends never used as dumb/genius. Those friends had not taken that IQ quiz at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Perschke</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/07/24/facebook-issues-statement-about-advertising-policies-and-user-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-26846</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Perschke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 00:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=14501#comment-26846</guid>
		<description>I had my profile picture taken and used by one of those 3rd party applications for a &#039;singles ad&#039; that was posted on a seperate site.  Beware of those 3rd party apps.  I have the highest security level set now and I refuse to use any of the 3rd party apps.  I can live without accepting a cyber beer or playing a quiz to find out what band I should be etc...  I also DO NOT play any of those games (Mafia wars, Farmtown etc..).  Anything that I have to &#039;allow&#039; a 3rd party to have access to my information is not going to be accepted.  Not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had my profile picture taken and used by one of those 3rd party applications for a &#8216;singles ad&#8217; that was posted on a seperate site.  Beware of those 3rd party apps.  I have the highest security level set now and I refuse to use any of the 3rd party apps.  I can live without accepting a cyber beer or playing a quiz to find out what band I should be etc&#8230;  I also DO NOT play any of those games (Mafia wars, Farmtown etc..).  Anything that I have to &#8216;allow&#8217; a 3rd party to have access to my information is not going to be accepted.  Not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

