<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building an Ad Network Inside Facebook: Q&amp;A with SocialCash CEO Rob Jewell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/</link>
	<description>Tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform for Developers and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:43:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragan Mestrovic</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/comment-page-1/#comment-25086</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragan Mestrovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=12872#comment-25086</guid>
		<description>Yes, performance based is good. It gives the advertiser more his cash. 
CPM works well for lead generation, the leads are of better quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, performance based is good. It gives the advertiser more his cash.<br />
CPM works well for lead generation, the leads are of better quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bailey McKallagat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/comment-page-1/#comment-25083</link>
		<dc:creator>Bailey McKallagat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=12872#comment-25083</guid>
		<description>congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky McElroy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/comment-page-1/#comment-25081</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky McElroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=12872#comment-25081</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think it’s interesting that there haven’t been any of the larger ad networks like Advertising.com, Specific Media, or Right Media making a play inside Facebook. It’s obviously a large opportunity, I think it makes sense that they aren’t doing it because it’s a totally unique kind of creative and set of data you’re working with.

As the inventory grows and the open movement gets bigger and bigger and Facebook Connect takes off, I would think there’s going to be a big play there at some point for one of the bigger ad networks. But even Google hasn’t cracked the code on how to monetize social network traffic - it’s a paradigm shift for almost any ad network, and that puts us and any other ad network working on this at an advantage. Besides, they’ve got hugely successful business already, and they can probably barely keep up with growth on the rest of the internet.&quot;

Rob makes a good point here.  The larger advertising networks have traditionally been slow to respond.  Garrish advertisements are the norm, not the exception.  As the internet&#039;s evolved, so too has internet advertising.  But still, it&#039;s rare to see a unique and engaging banner advertisement that&#039;s able to break through the clutter.

I&#039;m not saying SocialCash is there, yet.  Aesthetically, their ads aren&#039;t there.  And from a creative standpoint, they have a long way to go before they become something of an industry standard.  But in terms of targeted engagement, they have the idea down.

As social media continues to rapidly expand, traditional advertising networks will push deeper into capitalizing on the opportunity.  But they&#039;re still trying to figure out how to best utilize the space.  They&#039;re not only trying to figure out how to leverage the unique opportunities of social media in terms of targeting, but there seems to be an attempt at valuating the social media&#039;s sustainability as a space and a platform.  What networks seem sustainable, and in what form will those networks, like Twitter and Facebook, take in the future. Right now, it&#039;s up to the the independent third-parties to break into the space and monetize.  

This is their gold rush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think it’s interesting that there haven’t been any of the larger ad networks like Advertising.com, Specific Media, or Right Media making a play inside Facebook. It’s obviously a large opportunity, I think it makes sense that they aren’t doing it because it’s a totally unique kind of creative and set of data you’re working with.</p>
<p>As the inventory grows and the open movement gets bigger and bigger and Facebook Connect takes off, I would think there’s going to be a big play there at some point for one of the bigger ad networks. But even Google hasn’t cracked the code on how to monetize social network traffic &#8211; it’s a paradigm shift for almost any ad network, and that puts us and any other ad network working on this at an advantage. Besides, they’ve got hugely successful business already, and they can probably barely keep up with growth on the rest of the internet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rob makes a good point here.  The larger advertising networks have traditionally been slow to respond.  Garrish advertisements are the norm, not the exception.  As the internet&#8217;s evolved, so too has internet advertising.  But still, it&#8217;s rare to see a unique and engaging banner advertisement that&#8217;s able to break through the clutter.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying SocialCash is there, yet.  Aesthetically, their ads aren&#8217;t there.  And from a creative standpoint, they have a long way to go before they become something of an industry standard.  But in terms of targeted engagement, they have the idea down.</p>
<p>As social media continues to rapidly expand, traditional advertising networks will push deeper into capitalizing on the opportunity.  But they&#8217;re still trying to figure out how to best utilize the space.  They&#8217;re not only trying to figure out how to leverage the unique opportunities of social media in terms of targeting, but there seems to be an attempt at valuating the social media&#8217;s sustainability as a space and a platform.  What networks seem sustainable, and in what form will those networks, like Twitter and Facebook, take in the future. Right now, it&#8217;s up to the the independent third-parties to break into the space and monetize.  </p>
<p>This is their gold rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky McElroy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/comment-page-1/#comment-25080</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky McElroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=12872#comment-25080</guid>
		<description>CPM is an outdated model that isn&#039;t results orientated enough.  Paying by CPA makes the value of the advertisement greater, and forces the advertising platform to be more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPM is an outdated model that isn&#8217;t results orientated enough.  Paying by CPA makes the value of the advertisement greater, and forces the advertising platform to be more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/06/29/building-an-ad-network-inside-facebook-qa-with-socialcash-ceo-rob-jewell/comment-page-1/#comment-25007</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/?p=12872#comment-25007</guid>
		<description>CPA = Cost per action? I would think most of their rev comes from CPM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPA = Cost per action? I would think most of their rev comes from CPM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

