Recent Study Shows Virtual Gifting Behavior in Facebook Apps

BLiNQ Media released a white paper recently that takes a look at Facebook application behavior and profile data using records from an undisclosed “top gifting application on Facebook” with over 9 million users. Here’s a quick look at a few highlights:

  • 70% of users took over 30 days to respond to a gifting request. Acceptance activity picked up after 30 days and continued until 132 days later.
  • 73% of the application’s users were females, while 54% of the heavy users were men.
  • Only 6% of the users were responsible for 56% of the activity within the app.

3372183639_15ec80e48c_o
3373002454_e411fdecf2_o

The full white paper can be found here.

Facebook Announces Updates to New Home Page in Response to User Feedback

newhp

Since Facebook launched the redesigned home page two weeks ago, there has been a variety of feedback from users and press. Today, Facebook announced that it will be making some changes to the new home page in response to that feedback in the near future:

1. Live updating of the home page stream. Facebook said it will be adding this “soon” – now you will no longer need to refresh the page. Many users had requested that it update automatically.

2. Photos of tagged friends in the stream. Facebook said it will be adding photos of your tagged friends to the stream in “the coming weeks.” Photos of tagged friends were very prominent in the old News Feed.

3. More filters on application content. “We’ve heard feedback that there is a lot of application content appearing in the stream,” Facebook says. “We will be giving you tools to control and reduce application content that your friends share into your stream.” As we documented this morning, many of the fastest growing apps on the Facebook Platform since the home page redesign have been personality quizzes, and users have been complaining that quiz results have been taking up too much space in the stream (even though they were all intentionally shared by friends). Now, it sounds like Facebook may start letting users hide feed stories per application, not just per person.

4. More frequently updated highlights. Highlights will update more frequently throughout the day “to mirror more closely the content that the earlier News Feed provided.” Some users have complained that the highlights are not relevant enough and too stale.

5. Moving requests back to the top right column. Facebook will be moving friend requests and app requests back to the right column, likely because conversion rates went down when they moved them to their current location next to the welcome message.

6. Enabling friend list creation right from the home page. Currently, creating a friend list is not that easy – users have to go to the Friends page and create a new list.

In addition, Facebook said that it is thinking about making additional updates to the stream in the future. “We have the eventual goal of building filters that summarize this activity so you can see a more condensed view of what’s been going on. We’re also thinking about ways of filtering out some of the Wall posts and content directed to specific people to focus more on posts shared with everyone.”

Facebook is balancing its goals of turning the service into a real-time communications platform with users who are accustomed to using the site in different ways and who have configured their experience according to those use patterns. For example, many people around Silicon Valley complain that they built their Facebook friend list with different intentions than subscribing to their update stream, while many other casual users say that they can’t even tell the difference.

These updates fix many of the usability issues associated with the new stream, but don’t fundamentally change the direction Facebook is going.

Live from GDC: Casual MMOs on Facebook, The Impact of Facebook Connect on Mobile Games, Scrabble Gets Facebook Connect

gdclogo

For those tracking the growth of social games, our sister site Inside Social Games is live at GDC in San Francisco today with comprehensive coverage of all the conversations happening in the games industry regarding Facebook, the Facebook Platform, and Facebook Connect. Here’s a quick rundown of today’s discussions:

Live from GDC: Mobile Social Games – Are They As Big on Phones as They are on Social Networks? (ISG)

What ingredients are required for mobile social games to work? Andy Riedel from Tapatap leads a discussion on the issues facing mobile social game developers and how Facebook Connect for iPhone is solving some, but not all, of those problems.

Live Notes from GDC: Games That Connect People (ISG)

How do you take a casual game studio and make it into a social game studio? Execs from iWin and Zynga discuss how they’ve gone about building “casual MMO’s” and social games inside Facebook, including several keys to focus on and classic mistakes many developers make when adapting from traditional business models to those followed by most Facebook game shops.

GDC: EA’s Scrabble for IPhone Integrates With Facebook (PC World)

On Tuesday, EA Mobile’s Travis Boatman announced that it has launched Facebook Connect integration in Scrabble for iPhone. Now, you can play Facebook friends synchronously or asynchronously, and have multiple games going at once.

Which Applications Are Growing With the New Facebook Home Page?

It’s been almost two weeks now since Facebook launched the new “stream” home page. At the time, we published our guide for application developers interested in optimizing their apps for the new design. Which ones are succeeding?

According to AppData, the answer is clear: quizzes and brackets.

Top Gainers This Week
Name MAU Gain↓ Gain, % Developer
1. IQ test 2,827,492 +1,686,785 +147.9 Christopher Smit
2. Movies 13,752,039 +1,576,292 +13.0 Flixster
3. Super Wall 16,498,978 +1,320,196 +8.7 RockYou!
4. 2009 Bracket Challenge 1,675,763 +1,064,190 +174.0 Watercooler
5. How good are you in bed? 1,388,003 +866,813 +166.3 www.singlescave.com
6. The True Age Test 1,499,387 +736,559 +96.6 Quiz Monster
7. What is Your Actual Age? 1,238,525 +724,981 +141.2 Quiz Monster
8. what alcoholic drink are you? 944,947 +652,670 +223.3 Adam Linn
9. Which Mr Men Character are you? 696,007 +642,553 +1,202.1
10. Make a Quiz! 1,242,042 +582,778 +88.4
11. Who Were You In A Past Life? 1,164,956 +495,643 +74.1
12. Which Zodiac Sign Are You Most Compatible With? 604,821 +471,580 +353.9 Mishkaat Abid
13. What Pokemon Are You? 473,138 +455,002 +2,508.8 Joshua Taylor
14. What color are you? 367,198 +352,294 +2,363.8
15. Mafia Wars 8,962,449 +328,173 +3.8 Zynga
16. 2009 Bracket Challenge 621,293 +321,342 +107.1 Citizen Sports
17. Pet Society 9,098,787 +314,564 +3.6 Playfish
18. Astrology 659,997 +305,357 +86.1 Astrolis.com
19. Are You an Angel or a Devil? 546,782 +274,206 +100.6
20. CBSSports.com 492,366 +273,431 +124.9 CBSSports.com

March Madness Inside Facebook

On the NCAA hoops front, Watercooler’s 2009 Bracket Challenge is the most popular bracket game on Facebook by a wide margin, with over 1.67 million players. It grew by about a million users in the last week (note: I am an advisor at Watercooler). Citizen Sports’ 2009 Bracket Challenge also doubled in size this week to over 600k users, and CBSSports.com’s bracket app more than doubled to nearly 500k users.

In total, nearly 3 million people are playing bracket games with their friends on Facebook this year. Unlike last year, none of the apps received special promotion that we are aware of.

The Resurgence of Quiz Apps

quizfest

However, the broader story right now is the preponderance of quiz applications that are growing like wildfire (and annoying many users due to their prevalence in the home page stream). Each follows roughly the same premise: take a quiz, post the results on your profile, and invite friends to compare, and many do an effective job with prepopulating the new Feed Forms.

70% of this week’s top 20 fastest growing apps are quiz applications, including the fastest growing app on the platform, IQ Test. Many apps have doubled or tripled in size and some have gone from nothing to nearly a million users in the span of just over a week.

It’s somewhat reminescent of earlier chapters on the Facebook Platform when there were far less rules around virality. Now, these quiz apps are growing largely through explicit sharing by Facebook users via Feed Forms. It will be interesting to see if Facebook responds if these personality quizzes continue to hang around.

Q&A with Salesforce’s Clara Shih, Author of “The Facebook Era”

clarashihIn late 2007, we spoke with Clara Shih, then product line director for AppExchange at Salesforce, about Faceforce (now called Faceconnector), a SalesForce application that allows users to augment their traditional CRM data with information from Facebook which was created by Shih and Facebook counterpart Todd Perry in their spare time.

Since then, Clara has taken on responsibilities for social networking alliances and product strategy at Salesforce. This week, she is announcing the launch of her new book, The Facebook Era: Tapping Online Social Networks to Build Better Products, Reach New Audiences, and Sell More Stuff.

We recently spoke with Clara about The Facebook Era, her vision for social networking in the enterprise, and how her experiences at Salesforce informed the book.

facebookeracoverIF: Clara, why did you decide to write The Facebook Era?

CS: I wrote the book ultimately because I felt like it had to be written. When I developed Faceforce with Todd, it was just an experiment at the time. We developed it for a couple of reasons. One, when I was in a small restaurant in Hong Kong in May 2007, two men started talking about Facebook in Cantonese. I realized then that it wasn’t about technology, it was about the fundamental sociocultural shift taking place, and the changes in the kinds and quantities of relationships we’re able to have. Two, I started thinking about Facebook as my personal CRM system. Now, 175 million people have a database of contacts on Facebook. That’s a really efficient system – now, you have a pool of people to draw on in both your personal and professional life.  We heard all the stories of people who used Faceforce for sales and marketing and we realized we are on the cusp of something really big. We’re transitioning away from an anonymous web and into a world where identity matters.

How has your experience at Salesforce informed the book?

Faceforce would never have been developed if I wasn’t working at Salesforce. Living and breathing enterprise changed the way I thought about web applications, and basically brought workplace applications into my consciousness. At the first f8 developer conference when “poke” applications were launching, I kept asking – where are the business applications? Increasingly, many of us feel the lines blurring between our personal and professional lives. Understanding what the value of a CRM system has made me want to bring that same value to Facebook.  The future is changing because of this social layer.

Who did you write The Facebook Era for?

The Facebook Era is written for marketers, salespeople, and executives who understand that social technologies like Facebook and Twitter are important but don’t know exactly what it means for them or the steps they need to take to be a part of these communities.  The first part paints the vision of social and explores how social networking and online identity change  the kinds of interactions we can have with people online, putting it into the contexts of other major revolutions like the internet and PCs. The second part focuses on what the social graph means for marketing, sales, and recruiting. The third part goes into detail on how you set up your community. My goal for the book is to have people think differently about social media and social networking and how it affects relationships between vendor and customer.

What did you find most surprising when you were putting the book together?

What surprised me the most during this process was just how little people know about Facebook and Twitter and these other social networking services. This is true even for people who use them in their personal lives.  There seems to be a lack of awareness around some of the more sophisticated functionality like privacy controls or hyper-targeting ads, so that if I’m a marketer selling golf clubs I can create a very specific ad campaign for men from 40-55 who have “golf” listed as an interest in their profile.

What is your most important tip for people thinking about these questions?

For individuals, I would trust the importance of thinking carefully about whom you friend on Facebook and how you organize and tier those relationships. Specifically, what information you share with whom. Going forward, that’s going to be an important asset for each of us to manage – our personal brand.

For people purely in the business context acting on behalf of their brand, I would challenge them to start thinking differently about their customers and what audience segments they’re able to reach, because by using hypertargeting tools on Facebook and MySpace they can really tailor messages to tiny microsegments and test new segments that previously were too expensive to test.

Thanks Clara. Any final thoughts?

I don’t think people understand the magnitude of the change thus far.  When gopher or the web first came out, it was hard to fathom what it would mean for our lives, and now we’re at that point with the social web. We’re just embarking on the second phase of the web – the world wide web of people – and who knows how it will change the world.

Netflix Integrates Facebook Connect to Let Users Share Movie Ratings

Netflix is launching Facebook Connect integration tonight to let its users easily share their movie ratings with Facebook friends.

It’s a very simple integration and no-brainer for Netflix. Now, when users post their movie ratings to their Facebook profile, their friends will be able to click through to learn more about the movie and add it to their Netflix queue.

netflix

Earlier today, we described the metrics Citysearch has seen with their Facebook Connect integration: for each restaurant review shared on Facebook, about 30 people on average click through to Citysearch to learn more (a pretty impressive number). We’d expect shared Netflix movie ratings to perform well too.

Jambool Adds In-App Credit Card Payments to SocialGold

Jambool, which launched its payments widget for social apps and online games in January, has just added a new way for players to buy virtual currency to its SocialGold payments platform: direct credit card payments without leaving the app.

It’s another step in making in-app virtual currency purchases even more frictionless. Currently, most web-based payment options require users to leave the app to go through payment flows on Paypal or Amazon.

The in-app credit card payment option is now live on several applications including (Lil) Green Patch and World War II. Here’s how it looks:

socialgoldlgp1socialgoldlgp2

How has the in-app purchase flow affected conversion rates? Jambool CEO Vikas Gupta says that apps that have implemented the new payment option have seen jumps of up to 50%. In addition, Gupta notes that once players make a credit card payment once they can pay again on any game in the network without having to reenter their credit card information.

The social application payments space is evolving quickly. Payment providers are rushing to expand their geographic coverage and provide more advanced analytics systems to help developers learn from their users purchase patterns, while at the same time managing fraud and customer service. However, there is still a lot of room for making the user experience more frictionless, and SocialGold’s in-app credit card purchase option is another good step in that direction for Facebook app developers to consider.

Citysearch: Each Item Shared Through Facebook Connect Generates 30 Clicks

citysearchfbcCitysearch, one of the first websites to launch Facebook Connect integration in beta last November, has rolled out its Facebook Connect integration to all users as part of a larger redesign effort to make Citysearch more social.

With Facebook Connect, users can login with their Facebook accounts on Citysearch and share their local reviews with Facebook friends through Facebook’s feed system. In addition, users see the reviews written by their Facebook friends at the top of the Citysearch listings.

How has the beta test gone? CEO Jay Herratti told Claire Cain Miller of the New York Times,

In the four months the site has been testing Facebook Connect, 94 percent of reviewers have published their reviews to Facebook, where an average of 40 people see them and 70 percent click back to Citysearch. That has translated into new members: daily registrations on Citysearch have tripled.

citysearchshare

In other words, each item shared through Facebook Connect generates 40 impressions and 28 unique visitors – a lot of traffic per shared item. While it’s still too early to specifically characterize the value of that traffic in dollars, it’s very interesting to see how Facebook is generating traffic to content sites. Facebook drove more traffic to Perez Hilton than Google in January, and is sending traffic to video sites with Facebook Connect as well.

Introducing the Facebook Marketing Bible – Agency & Brand Edition

fmbabelogo Since we published the first version of the Facebook Marketing Bible in 2007, thousands of agencies, marketers, social application developers, entrepreneurs, and educators have used it to craft their Facebook marketing strategies and plan their Facebook marketing tactics. Each month since, we have provided marketers with updated versions of the Facebook Marketing Bible containing the latest updates, data, insights, and best practices.

However, it’s become clear that as the spectrum of Facebook marketing opportunities has increased – the March 2009 edition details over 43 specific features and tools, nearly twice as many as the original edition – brands and agencies responsible for deploying large chunks of client dollars need a more strategic overview of Facebook and the Facebook Platform ecosystem as well as deeper independent directional guidance on Facebook and Facebook advertising products.

Purchase this report

The Facebook Marketing Bible – Agency & Brand Edition
Buy PDF: $495 USD
OR Buy PDF + 1 Year Free Quarterly Updates: $995 USD

That’s exactly why we’ve produced the Facebook Marketing Bible – Agency & Brand Edition, a new version of the Facebook Marketing Bible specifically designed for large brands and agencies. The Facebook Marketing Bible – Agency & Brand Edition contains both high-level analytical overviews of the Facebook platform and advertising ecosystems for agencies and brands and detailed guides on how to design and optimize advertising products.

This 130-page report contains the following sections (a full table of contents is listed below):

I. Understanding Facebook and the Facebook Platform Ecosystem: A Strategic Overview for Agencies and Brands

  • Facebook’s Vision and Future Product Directions
  • Key Elements of the Facebook Ecosystem & Their Intended Uses for Brands
  • Applications & Public Profiles: Framing the Comparison for Agencies and Brand Managers

II. Advertising Options in the Facebook Ecosystem

  • Facebook Advertising Products
  • Facebook Platform Advertising Opportunities

III. Crash Course: Building & Running Facebook Pages/Public Profiles

IV. Crash Course: Designing & Building High Performance Facebook Applications

V. Using Facebook Connect to Make Websites More Social

VI. Recommended Partners

In addition, every customer who purchases a copy of the Facebook Marketing Bible – Agency & Brand Edition will receive a free copy of the latest Facebook Global Monitor – Tracking Facebook in Global Markets report. The Facebook Global Monitor provides marketers with an up to date and comprehensive view of Facebook’s international growth in nearly 100 global markets across North and South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and Africa.

The Facebook Marketing Bible – Agency & Brand Edition is available for purchase today for $495, or $995 for an annual subscription that includes three future quarterly updates. And as always, we’re available to customers for further questions and help as you craft your Facebook marketing strategy.




justinsmithAbout the Author

Justin Smith founded Inside Facebook, the first blog focused on tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform, in April 2006. In 2007, he wrote the Facebook Marketing Bible, the most widely referenced book on Facebook marketing today. The Facebook Marketing Bible has been used by thousands of brands, agencies, businesses, universities, and non-profit organizations to craft their Facebook marketing strategy.

From 2007 to 2009, Justin served as Head of Product for Watercooler, a venture-backed startup based in Mountain View, California, and one of the leading developers of applications on Facebook and other major social platforms. Under Justin’s leadership, Watercooler’s Facebook applications reached well over 30 million Facebook users, and Watercooler established itself as the leading network of sports and television entertainment applications by a large margin. Justin remains an advisor to Watercooler today.

Prior to Inside Facebook, Justin was an early employee at Xfire, the largest social utility for gamers, which was sold to Viacom for $102 million in 2006. Prior to Xfire, Justin earned a degree in Computer Systems Engineering from Stanford University, where he was a Mayfield Fellow and a recipient of the Terman Award in Engineering.

Prior to Stanford, Justin co-founded the MyDesktop Network, an early internet media company, in 1996. MyDesktop was later acquired by Jupitermedia/Internet.com in 1999.

Justin grew up in South Carolina and currently lives in Palo Alto, California.

My Name is Not a URL

This is a guest post by Chris Messina, a long time open web advocate, “project agitator” at Vidoop, and current board member at the OpenID Foundation. You can find more from Chris on his blog.

messina1

Arrington has a post that claims that Facebook is getting wise to something MySpace has known from the start – users love vanity URLs.

I don’t buy it. In fact, I’m pretty sure that the omission of vanity URLs on Facebook is an intentional design decision from the beginning, and one that I’ve learned to appreciate over time.

From what I’ve gathered, it was co-founder Dustin Moskovitz’s stubbornness that kept Facebook from allowing the use of pseudonymic usernames common on previous-generation social networks like AOL. Considering that Mark Zuckerberg’s plan is to build an online version of the relationships we have in real life, it only makes sense that we should, therefore, call our friends by their IRL names — not the ones left over or suggested by a computer.

But there’s actually something deeper going on here — something that I talked about at DrupalCon — because there are at least two good uses for letting people set their own vanity URLs — three if your service somehow surfaces usernames as an interface handle:

  1. Uniqueness and remembering
  2. Search engine optimization
  3. Facilitating member-to-member communication (as in the case of Twitter’s @replies)

For my own sake, I’ve lately begun decreasing the distance between my real identity and my online persona, switching from @factoryjoe to @chrismessina on Twitter. While there are plenty of folks who know me by my digital moniker, there are far more who don’t and shouldn’t need to in order to interact with me.

When considering SEO, it’s quite obvious that Google has already picked up on the correlation:

messina2

Ironically, in Dustin’s case (intentionally or not) he is not an authority for his own name on Google (despite the uniqueness of his name). Instead, semi-nefarious sites like Spock use SEO to get prominent placement for Dustin’s name (whether he likes it or not):

messina3

Finally, in cases like Twitter, IM or IRC, nicknames or handles are used explicitly to refer to other people on the system, even if (or especially if!) real identities are never revealed. While this separation can afford a number of perceived benefits, long-term it’s hard to quantify the net value of pseudonymity when it most assholes on the web seem to act out most aggressively when shrouding their real names.

By shunning vanity URLs for its members, Facebook has achieved three things:

  1. Establishes a new baseline for transparent online identity
  2. Avoids the naming collision problem by scoping relationships within a person’s [reciprocal] social graph
  3. Upgrades expectations for human interaction on social websites

That everyone on Facebook has to use their real name (and Facebook will root out and disable accounts with pseudonyms), there’s a higher degree of accountability because legitimate users are forced to reveal who they are offline. No more “funnybunny345″ or “daveman692″ creeping around and leaving harassing wall posts on your profile; you know exactly who left the comment because their name is attached to their account.

Go through the comments on TechCrunch and compare those left by Facebook users with those left by everyone else. In my brief analysis, Facebook commenters tend to take their commenting more seriously. It’s not a guarantee, but there is definitely a correlation between durable identity and higher quality participation.

Now, one might point out that, without unique usernames, you’d end up with a bunch of name collisions — and you’d be right. However, combining search-by-email with profile photos largely eliminates this problem, and since Facebook requires bidirectional friendship confirmation, it’s going to be hard to get the wrong “Mike Smith” showing up in your social graph. So instead of futzing with (and probably forgetting) what strange username your friend uses, you can just search by (concept!) their real name using Facebook’s type-ahead find. And with autocompletion, you’ll never spell it wrong (of course Gmail has had this for ages as well).

Let me make a logical leap here and point out here that this is the new namespace — the human-friendly namespace — that Tim O’Reilly observed emerging when he defined Web 2.0, pointing out that a future source of lock-in would be “owning a namespace”. This is why location-based services are so hot. This is also why it matters who gets out in front first by developing a database of places named by humans — rather than by their official names. When it comes to search, search will get better when you can bound it — to the confluence of your known world and the known/colloquial world of your social graph.

When I was San Diego a couple weeks back, it dawned on me that if I searched for “Joe’s Crab Shack”, no search engine on earth would be able to give me a satisfying result… unless it knew where I was. Or where I had been. Or, where my friends had been. This is where social search and computer-augmented social search becomes powerful (see Aardvark). Not just that, but this is where owning a database of given names tied to real things becomes hugely powerful (see Foursquare). This is where social objects with human-given names become the spimatic web.

So, as this plays out, success will find the designer who most nearly replicates the world offline online. Consider:

messina4

vs:

messina5

and:

messina6

vs.

messina7

Ignoring content, it seems to me that the latter examples are much easier to grok without knowing anything about Facebook or Twitter — and are much closer approximations of real life.

Moreover, in EventBox, there is evidence that we truly are in a transitional period, where a large number of people still identity themselves or know their friends by usernames, but an increasing number of newcomers are more comfortable using real names (click to enlarge):

messina8

We’re only going to see more of this kind of thing, where the data-driven design approach will give way to a more overall humane aesthetic. It begins by calling people by the names we humans prefer to — and will always — use. And I think Facebook got it right by leaving out the vanity URLs.

Inside Facebook Sponsors
GREE Shoutlet maudau Frima Votigo LifeStreet Nanigans
Featured Company
Jobs of the Day

GOOD/Corps
Los Angeles, CA

Creative Circle
Los Angeles, CA

MTV K
New York, NY

More Research & Information from Inside Facebook

Sign up for free email updates beyond today's news.

 

WebMediaBrands
Mediabistro | All Creative World | Inside Network
Jobs | Education | Research | Events | News
Advertise | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright 2012 WebMediaBrands Inc. All rights reserved.