Inside Network - Providing news and market research to the Facebook platform and social gaming ecosystem Inside Facebook    Inside Social Games    Inside Virtual Goods    AppData    PageData  
Facebook Marketing Bible   App Stats   Page Stats   Contact   About   Advertise       Subscribe:   Email   RSS   Twitter   Facebook
Super Rewards
By Justin Smith 3 Comments »

battlestations-300x225Inside Social Games has the story today of TYLER Projects, a Singaporean developer of social games on Facebook that is showing strong revenue numbers on virtual goods transactions with a relatively “small” audience by traditional Facebook application advertising standards.

In what is becoming a growing theme these days, the majority of TYLER’s business comes from international audiences on the Facebook Platform. According to co-founder Leonard Lin, over 51% of players in Battle Stations, the company’s main game, are in Asia / Pacific. That breaks down to 17.5% in Hong Kong, 12% in Singapore, 7% in Malaysia, 6% in Indonesia, and 3% in Austrailia. Only 21% of players are in the US, and another 7% are in Canada.

And unlike many Facebook applications, Battle Stations is monetizing well. According to Lin, the company is doing about USD $40,000 per month in virtual goods transactions in the game.

How has TYLER done it?

“Many Facebook ‘games’ might give some short term satisfaction but they don’t really involve any strategy, which is critical to creating an engaging experience,” says Lin. “They also have limited content which means players will get bored quickly once they feel they’ve seen all there is to see in the game – which is bad obviously if you want them to spend money on the game.”

battlestationsocho1

Lin says the company’s strategy has focused on developing the core game mechanic and security, instead of focusing on virality.

We decided not to go the route other developers went: focusing on growing their user base, adding more apps, making them more viral, etc. Instead we kept working on Battle Stations trying to improve it: more content, better security, better gameplay and balance.

The reason we chose that strategy? We wanted to monetize with a virtual goods model; and for that to happen our game would have to be:

  1. Relatively secure – Customers probably wouldn’t like it very much if a hacker or scripter could obtain the same virtual goods for free.
  2. Long term engaging – The game has to have enough content and provide a deep enough experience if we want repeat purchases of our virtual goods.

TYLER Projects is one example of an emerging class of companies building new businesses on the Facebook Platform through virtual goods transactions and focusing on a valuable target demographic. We expect to see more of these companies sprouting up as 2009 progresses.

Read more at Inside Social Games >>

Check out The Facebook Marketing Bible: 50+ Ways to Market Your Brand, Company, Product, or Service Inside Facebook.

Inside Facebook Sponsors
AdParlor     SoftLayer
Mopay

3 Responses to “Developers of Facebook’s Battle Stations Making $40,000 Per Month with 70,000 Monthly Players”

  1. Ben Barren - Confessions of a Mad Man » it’s all digital goods + asia Says:

    [...] and digital goods, and that it will be focusing on the latter over the next six months.” + InsideFacebook covering TylerProjects : Hawt 640 lambo via VODCars [...]

  2. Entrepreneur 27 Singapore » Blog Archive » Social Games: The Web 2.0 of Gaming Says:

    [...] tracks Facebook and its platform, with having $40,000 in monthly revenue and 70,000 monthly users (click here). I did a check on appdata.com, a site that provides metrics on Facebook applications, and based on [...]

  3. Interview with Leonard Lin, Tyler Projects and BattleStations 2 Years Later : Singapore Entrepreneurs Says:

    [...] Related Links: All Facebook, Developers of Facebook’s Battle Stations Making $40,000 Per Month with 70,000 Monthly Players. [...]

Community

Login using your Facebook account, or enter your personal information below to comment.
Recent visitors
view more...

Leave a Reply