<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Facebook Research from O&#8217;Reilly and Compete</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/06/new-facebook-research-from-oreilly-and-compete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/06/new-facebook-research-from-oreilly-and-compete/</link>
	<description>Tracking Facebook and the Facebook Platform for Developers and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pinto</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/06/new-facebook-research-from-oreilly-and-compete/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 13:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/06/new-facebook-research-from-oreilly-and-compete/#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>I posted the following on 500hats blog: 

The only bit in this report that actually worth reading is the one you [Dave McClure] contributed, and I hope you [Dave McClure] get a big fat cut of the $140++ O&#039;reilly charged for the report.
Don&#039;t get me wrong - the report in all is ok, but there&#039;s nothing there that you can&#039;t find in 500hats or InsideFacebook... for many of the broke facebook apps writers $140 is not petty cash, and O&#039;reilly should have been a bit more mindful about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the following on 500hats blog: </p>
<p>The only bit in this report that actually worth reading is the one you [Dave McClure] contributed, and I hope you [Dave McClure] get a big fat cut of the $140++ O&#8217;reilly charged for the report.<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; the report in all is ok, but there&#8217;s nothing there that you can&#8217;t find in 500hats or InsideFacebook&#8230; for many of the broke facebook apps writers $140 is not petty cash, and O&#8217;reilly should have been a bit more mindful about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flavio Rump</title>
		<link>http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/06/new-facebook-research-from-oreilly-and-compete/comment-page-1/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Flavio Rump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/10/06/new-facebook-research-from-oreilly-and-compete/#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>Only 80k people use poking and only 500k people added friends during the whole month? There&#039;s gotta be something fundamentally wrong with those statistics. Or is it the daily value? Then it might make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 80k people use poking and only 500k people added friends during the whole month? There&#8217;s gotta be something fundamentally wrong with those statistics. Or is it the daily value? Then it might make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

